In this paper, One Cycle Control technique is implemented in the bridgeless PFC. By using one cycle control both the voltage sensing and current sensing. rectifier and power factor correction circuit to a single circuit, the output of which is double the voltage implementation of One Cycle Control required a better controller. . The figure shows a typical buck converter using PWM technique. PWM switching technique is used here as implementation of One Cycle Power Factor Correction, Bridgeless voltage Doubler, Buck Converter, One Cycle Control This problem can be solved by using bridgeless converters to reduce the.
|Published (Last):||15 January 2017|
|PDF File Size:||4.69 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.10 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Although the circuit structure is simple, the location of the boost inductor on the AC side makes it difficult to sense the AC line voltage and inductor current. A implemenation number of switching cycles are also required to attain the steady state. The prototype of a typical converter is shown below.
One Cycle Control of Bridgeless Buck Converter | Open Access Journals
Among these topologies, the bridgeless boost does not require range switch and shows both simplicity and high performance. Since the switched variable always follows the control reference the output voltage is independent of all input voltage variations.
I also render my sincere thanks to all technuque professors of electrical and electronics department of MACE for their valuable suggestions given to me during the completion of my thesis work Last but not the least I sincerely thank my parents and husband for all their support and encouragement and for the sacrifices they have made, that helped me to complete the project successfully. Conventional ac-dc converters has a diode bridge rectifier followed by power factor correction circuit.
Switch mode power supplies without power factor correction will introduce harmonic content to the input current waveform which cylce ultimately results in a low power factor and hence lower efficiency.
Abstract To reduce the rectifier bridge conduction loss, different topologies have been developed. Each converter is operating during positive and negative half cycle respectively.
One Cycle Control of Bridgeless Buck Converter
The output voltage V0 is fed to the integrator. The bridgeless voltage doubler buck converter configuration has been studied. When switching pulses are given to one of the switches the other switch will be off. But this circuit suffers from significant conduction and switching losses due to larger number of semiconducting devices.
The output of the flip flop is the required gating pulse for the switches. In this paper ,a new control method called One Cycle Bridgeles is used for controlling the buck converter during both half of supply voltage. Therefore, one cycle control gives an attractive solution for the bridgeless PFC circuit.
The simulation is done at a switching frequency of 65kHz.
Bridgeless PFC Implementation Using One CycleControl Technique
This drop of efficiency at low line can cause increased input current that produces higher losses in semiconductors and input EMI filter controk.
The total output obtained is the sum of voltage across each capacitor of the buck converters which are operating during positive and negative half respectively. Also it has relatively output voltage, typically in the V range. Similarly, the buck converter consisting of the unidirectional switch implemented by diode Db in series with switch S2freewheeling diode D2filter inductor L2and output capacitor C2 operates only during negative half-cycles of line voltage Vac.
By increasing the switching frequency almost constant output voltage can be obtained by this control method.
Switching converters are pulsed and nonlinear dynamic systems. The input voltage implementatio current waveforms, gating signals and the output obtained are shown. By using one cycle control both the voltage sensing and current sensing issues of the bridgeless PFC circuit can be solved. The voltage available at the output is double the voltage across each capacitor.
When the integrated value of the diode-voltage becomes equal to the control reference, the transistor is turned OFF and bridgeleas integration is immediately reset to zero to prepare for the next cycle.
The gating signals given to the switches during the positive and negative half cycle, input and the output waveforms obtained during the simulation are shown below.
The buck converter is generating an output voltage of 12V using One Cycle Control method. As long as the area under the diode-voltage waveform in each cycle is the same as the control reference signal, instantaneous control of the diode-voltage is vridgeless.
Figure shows a typical buck converter employing One Cycle control. Tecjnique Cycle Control is a new nonlinear control technique implemented to control the duty ratio of the switch in real time such that in each cycle the average value input waveform at the switch rectifier output diode is exactly equal to the control reference.
Since bridegless error generated is used to vary the duty ratio to keep the voltage constant ,this method produce a slow response. Since the reset signal is a pulse with very short width, the reset time is very short, and the integration is activated immediately after the resetting.
Since the switches are located between the input and the output capacitors, switches S1 and S2 can actively control the input inrush current during start-up.
To reduce the rectifier bridge conduction loss, different topologies have been developed. The simulation of bridgeless buck voltage doubler circuit using One Cycle Control was done in Matlab simulink and the waveforms obtained at the time of simulation is presented here. Power Electronics Europe, No. I would like to thank my internal guide Prof.
At the same time EMI results show that the circuit noise is controllable. As a result the control reference is linearly modulated into the duty ratio signal. Compared to the average current mode control, one cycle control shows many benefits such as no multiplier requirement, no input voltage sensing requirement, and no inductor current sensing requirement. The hardware setup of the circuit is designed and implemented. The experimental results show both efficiency improvement and good power factor correction function.
The buck converter operating during positive half-cycles of line voltage Vac consists of a unidirectional switch comprising of diode Da in series with switch S1 freewheeling diode D1filter inductor L1 impoementation output capacitor C1.
I extend my deep sense of gratitude and hearty thanks to Prof. The input current flows through only one diode during the conduction of a switch, i.